![]() ![]() ![]() Q4 2019 was also the app's best quarter yet for user spending, with the $88.5 million that it earned that quarter equalling double the the previous quarter's gross, and six times that generated during the same quarter in 2018.Ĭhina is still TikTok’s biggest spender, with the $122.9 million spent by iOS users there accounting for 69 percent of the market share in 2019 and more than tripling what U.S. TikTok grossed $176.9 million in 2019-71 percent of its all-time total of $247.6 million. (Note that Sensor Tower does not track data from third-party Android stores in China or other regions.) TikTok’s Most Successful Year for Revenue In comparison, China was TikTok’s second largest market for 2019, representing 7 percent of all downloads-down from its 16 percent share in 2018-with nearly 52 million for that country's version, Douyin, while the United States accounted for 6 percent with close to 46 million. TikTok was the second most-downloaded app across the App Store and Google Play globally last year, surpassed only by WhatsApp's 849 million downloads.ĭespite having been banned in India in late April, that market still managed to lead the way for TikTok downloads in 2019 with 323 million installs, accounting for 44 percent of the overall figure, up from the 27 percent share it held in 2018 with 180 million installs. Q4 2019 was its best quarter yet, with its 219 million installs representing 6 percent Y/Y growth from its previous best quarter of Q4 2018. TikTok has clocked more than 1.65 billion downloads to date, with new users added in 2019 representing 13 percent year-over-year growth from the 655 million installs the app registered in 2018. PAO is the new normal as Moore’s law is dead and there is nothing anyone can do about until we move past silicon.ByteDance's social video app TikTok reached more than 738 million downloads and grossed nearly $177 million globally-more than five times its 2018 revenue-in 2019, according to Sensor Tower Store Intelligence data. ![]() By changing it to 3 years, Intel is just accepting the reality that moving to newer process nodes is just going to be harder and longer. Moving to a 3-year cadence makes much more sense as Intel has already been slipping into a 2.5 year ‘Tick Tock’ cycle since the launch of Haswell/Haswell-Refresh. The delays and costs Intel faced with 14nm and 10nm simply precluded them moving onto a new node in the 2 years ‘Tick Tock’ requires. That was followed the next year with the new Skylake architecture in 2015 and then Kaby Lake, which is an optimized Skylake architecture still on 14nm will drop this year. ![]() The perfect example is this upcoming generation where we saw Broadwell on the new 14nm node in 2014. This will then be followed the next year by a new architecture and finally, in the third year, Intel will optimize both the process and architecture for the final release on that process. Under PAO, the first year is a new process node, which is based on a known architecture. While the old way was to introduce a new process on the Tick year followed by a new architecture in the Tock year, PAO builds on the same idea. Unlike ‘Tick-Tock’, ‘Process-Architecture-Optimization’ carries a much more unwieldy title but it is the natural evolutionary step. It comes as no surprise now, that Intel has revealed the successor to ‘Tick Tock’, PAO, or better known as ‘Process-Architecture-Optimization’. Though it has served Intel well in the past, recent years have shown that the strategy has become untenable. Adopted in the troubled days of 2006 and Netburst, ‘Tick-Tock’ has served Intel well, pushing the processor firm ever forwards. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |